setsuled: (Doctor Chess)


The oldest surviving film by an African American filmmaker is 1920's Within Our Gates. The second film in the long career of Oscar Micheaux (the first is lost) it already displays his exceptional talent for cinematic storytelling. Featuring the Victorian sentimentality common to early cinema, the plot's picaresque stream of unlikely turns of events also seamlessly incorporate real issues faced by black Americans in the early 20th century.



The son of a former slave, Micheaux lived in a United States where the Civil War was still very much a part of the first hand national memory. The first title card uses some bitter irony to indicate how racism was still a problem throughout the country, north and south:



The film primarily follows a beautiful young black woman named Sylvia Landry (Evelyn Preer). Unlike many black men and women of her generation, she's well educated, a fact complicated by trauma in her past we learn about later in the film. The film spends time focusing on women's suffrage and how one racist character fears allowing women the vote specifically because she's afraid of black women voting. But the film is primarily focused on education as it becomes Sylvia's mission to procure funding in the north for a school for black children in the south.



We see one poor black farmer bringing his children to the school, explaining how his kids have made him aware of their need to be educated in order to have any hope of a decent future. This seems improbably forward thinking for a couple of pre-teens but of course they're right, something a racist, wealthy white woman named Geraldine (Bernice Ladd) seems well aware of.



She discourages another wealthy woman, Elena ("Mrs. Evelyn"), from providing funding for the school on the grounds that black people weren't meant to be educated. Geraldine's racism is the kind one might expect but this scene segues into one of several that portray racism operating in the black community. We see a black minister preaching against the right for black citizens to vote, something we later see he's put up to doing by a couple of prominent white men.



This is one of several ways the film seems designed to counter arguments based on cases of submissiveness to racial hierarchy and criminal behaviour in the black community. Sylvia's cousin (Floy Clements) tries to get her to marry a gambler and thief (Jack Chenault), a circumstance that threatens to damage Sylvia's efforts to attain school funding by exposing her past. The last portion of the film is mostly a flashback to her childhood which contains ugly incidents of lynching and rape as well as an improbable circumstance that leads to her own education being financed. In this case, the mechanics of melodrama serve to highlight the injustice of presumptions about personal character based on popular morality. This is a form of argument against Victorian moral purity that would be familiar to readers of a diversity of Victorian authors from Oscar Wilde to Charles Dickens.



Performances throughout the film are very good, particularly from Preer and Clements. Mostly it's the type of broad, theatrical performance necessitated by silent film. Clements is particularly good at heaving her chest to convey stress. But there's also a brutal naturalism to the performances which makes the violence in the later scenes effective.

The film is in the public domain and can be viewed in its entirety on YouTube:

setsuled: (Default)


I think the most heartening thing about Roy Moore's defeat in Alabama is that he's a lot like Trump. His track record of bigotry, stupidity, and corny show-boating make him improbably cartoonish in a way that only Trump could rival. The fact that Trump threw his support behind his fellow Birther lunatic, and convinced the Republican party to do the same, makes Doug Jones' victory feel even more like a referendum on the 2016 Presidential election.

Most articles about Moore, outside far-right press, lead with Moore's "multiple allegations of predatory behaviour toward teen-agers" (quoting from this New Yorker article). Though on the list of absurdly obvious disqualifiers for Moore it seems racism was the biggest factor as it was non-white voters who decided the election in favour of Doug Jones by a massive margin. In fact, it seems most white voters still went for Moore.

It's weird, the more I think about this, the more depressing it gets. I guess it's something that it's highly unusual for Alabama to go to a Democrat, but victory against a guy who doesn't believe in evolution shouldn't be such a shock. Maybe in the next world.

I'm kind of glad that the sexual assault allegations weren't the deciding factor, even if they are likely true. Just to-day Chuck Schumer has exposed an elaborate plot to falsely make it appear he's been accused of sexual harassment. If allegations of sexual misconduct haven't been used as political pure propaganda already it looks inevitable that they will be. This would have the effect of both distracting voters from other issues and risk making legitimate claims of sexual assault and harassment seem less credible. In fact, I'm also not glad the sexual assault allegations weren't a deciding factor in Roy Moore's loss as it may indicate a public growing increasingly deaf to them.

Anyway, maybe I can dare hope that more people in the U.S. are starting to think it's bad to have in office real people who seem like 19th century political cartoon caricatures.

Profile

setsuled: (Default)
setsuled

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 12th, 2026 03:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios