setsuled: (Default)


What better way to make a movie about a great painter than to make the movie in many ways like a painting? With 1986's Caravaggio, director Derek Jarman and his cinematographer Gabriel Beristain meticulously create images that evoke the work of their subject, the great Renaissance painter Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio. Though the film never employs the kinds of severe contrasts between darks and lights Caravaggio's work is known for, there's enough resemblance in the careful lighting to be extraordinarily beautiful.



The film doesn't bother with a linear biography of the man, frequently jumping about to different incidents that are shown with the actors often at ease, saying little. In a choice very much in keeping with 1980s post-modernism, Jarman incorporates elements like cars and type-writers in the story of a Renaissance painter without explanation but fortunately it never proves too distracting. Nigel Terry plays the adult Caravaggio with a drowsy contemplativeness; the younger Caravaggio played by Dexter Fletcher shows a little more energy fending off the sexual advances of some would-be patrons. A more convivial relationship is hinted at between the young man and Cardinal Del Monte (Michael Gough) after a suggestive scene where Caravaggio bargains with the Cardinal over the possession of a knife which the young artist then puts in his mouth.



A more fraught romance occurs later in the form of a turbulent love triangle between the adult Caravaggio and a street fighter named Ranuccio (Sean Bean) and his wife, Lena (Tilda Swinton).



Each becomes a model for Caravaggio, neither able to restrain the jealousy of the love each imagines Caravaggio has for the other. But the passions involved in this relationship are utilised as fuel for tableau more than plots. An eventful party the three go to is more fascinating for its peculiar mixture of aristocratic finery and ancient corpses. Every time a normally dramatic revelation comes--a pregnancy, a murder--it all seems secondary to compositions, and the characters seem intriguingly aware of this.



Maybe it's not so strange since these paintings have endured long after the drama.

Twitter Sonnet #1065

The red is all hallucination's fault.
A spraying suit or body's earnest song?
Who would taste the trodden dirt for salt?
If burning books is right I'm happy wrong.
A garden taped to growing walls suspends.
In doctrines drank in fluted cups announced.
The steady cask of ink and pulp amends.
The nose and eyes to tusk in like amounts.
A wider earth in tinsel strain appeared.
As needle tea remained beneath the pine.
Four jelly engines burnt the lesser geared.
A jolly TIE delivered solar wine.
A whistling drifts through kettle trees for steam.
The shadows of some stilted steps are seen.
setsuled: (Frog Leaf)


I'd think it difficult to be led astray by the title of 1964's Dr. Terror's House of Horrors. Though as a matter of fact we never see Dr. Terror's house--but it is a satisfyingly lurid horror anthology film, the first of a series for which British studio Amicus would become famous for in the 1960s and 1970s. Like most of those films, it features Peter Cushing, joined in this case by his friend and frequent Hammer co-star Christopher Lee. Both effectively play against type and the film's greatest flaw, its thoroughly illogical screenplay, even kind of contributes to how good it is. It's almost nightmare logic.



The framing story takes place on a train, not a house, where Dr. Schreck, played by Peter Cushing, tells the fortunes of five men in the car with him, one after another. Each story ends in doom for its subject, one of the movie's logical problems being that no-one asks if they can't avert fate now that they've been given foreknowledge. Though an unsurprising and effectively strange conclusion to the film arguably solves this problem.



Schreck's name means terror in German and Cushing plays the character with a thick accent and a lot more hair than is usual for him. A bigger departure, though, is Christopher Lee as one of the compartment occupants.



His story, the penultimate, is about revenge in the art world. "Disembodied Hand" bears a lot of resemblance to a story from the Tales from the Crypt comics, "The Maestro's Hand". Lee plays a vicious and conceited art critic named Franklyn Marsh who's embarrassed when an artist named Eric Landor (Michael Gough) tricks him into praising a painting by a chimpanzee.



It seems meant to prove a point he'd been making when Marsh had been publicly bashing an exhibition of Landor's paintings--Landor makes the argument that art is totally subjective and that its power resides in the viewer. Marsh's view of art as a measurable skill is rocked by the revelation of the chimpanzee artist so thoroughly that he goes quiet and literally runs away whenever Landor enters a room. As such, a disembodied hand that tries to strangle Marsh later in the story might be interpreted as a manifestation of repressed psychological issues.



And that's supported by Lee's nervous, fussy performance and it's really a highlight of his virtuosity to watch this alongside his natural and exuberant performance as Rasputin in Rasputin: The Mad Monk. Though I wonder if it really would've been so hard to say maybe a chimpanzee has talent. The fact that the ape's art is better than Landor's might have been a nice way to turn the insult around, Marsh really had to put his foot in it to make Landor's prank work, a slightly unlikely scenario, another thing that seems dreamlike.



Maybe the most dreamlike story in the film is the second one starring Benard Lee as a scientist trying to save a man and his family from a carnivorous vine inexplicably attacking his house.



There's no explanation for it, the plant just seems to've gone crazy one day. It's also difficult to understand why it's so hard to defeat.

The final story features Donald Sutherland as a doctor who brings his French wife (Jennifer Jayne) home to New York with him. The story is about vampirism and makes absolutely no sense, filled with motivations that turn on a dime. Sutherland is weird to watch, contemplating the murder of his wife with a wooden stake with only vague, mild distress.



There's absolutely nothing in this story to make you think it was shot anywhere near New York--apart from Sutherland, all the American accents are unconvincing and every scene was clearly shot on a sound stage.



But I like the look of it, the Technicolour in this movie is sort of gorgeously brash, particularly in the first story which is a sort of combination werewolf and haunted house story set in Scotland (again, mostly sound stages).



The film also features a story about a musician punished by supernatural forces for stealing a melody from a Haitian Voodoo ceremony, the weakest story in the film but weird enough to be enjoyable. The whole film is slightly unhinged fun.

Twitter Sonnet #1053

Two rivers make an absent third alive.
A sibling text appeared in pairs of notes.
A quiz delayed'll fade the brain's archive.
A grey and quiet crew deploy their boats.
Descending sizes stretch the cauldrons out.
In boiling clocks the hands are useless oars.
The gentlest tree contorts for leafy gout.
And ev'ry eve a cat conducts the tours.
The shadow horns replaced the scales in mind.
Ouroboros in human hearts decayed.
Expanding lungs of darkened walls rewind.
And slowly lids of metal eye cascade.
As straw inside investors try to birth.
A metal ice revisits corp'rate Earth.
setsuled: (Default)


It would be sort of comforting to think that influential men in the entertainment industry who prey on women are also talentless. That's part of the fantasy presented in the 1962 Hammer version of Phantom of the Opera, and a big part of why the film never rises above moderately interesting. It does, though, have some really gorgeous cinematography by Arthur Grant, beautiful makeup and costumes, and is a surprisingly lush production next to the typically low budget movies released by Hammer.

Directed by Terence Fisher, the female lead is renamed Christine Charles from Christine Daae for the story's relocation from Paris to London. She's also reduced to the pretty sack of potatoes one usually sees in Fisher's films. Played by Heather Sears, her singing voice was dubbed by an opera singer named Pat Clark pretty seamlessly and there are some really nicely put together scenes featuring bits of an opera about Joan of Arc composed for the film.



Michael Gough plays Lord Ambrose D'Arcy, the film's real villain. He uses his position as the composer of a series of successful operas to abuse the women who appear in them and it looks like Christine is going to be his latest victim until the opera's producer, Harry--the dull Edward de Souza in a role supposedly written for Cary Grant--rescues her from dinner with D'Arcy. The Phantom, played with some elegance but little dimension by Herbert Lom, is mostly portrayed as a victim in this film, having no control over his Igor-like assistant (Ian Wilson) who perpetrates the murders the phantom is guilty of in the original story. He murders a rat-catcher played by Patrick Troughton in one of the film's more enjoyably macabre scenes.



The Phantom's interest in Christine is apparently entirely in her singing voice and at worst he comes off as a much too strict instructor. The film actually seems like its makers took the plagiarism subplot from the beginning of The Red Shoes and took out all the complications to create a simpler story of a downtrodden artist and a thoroughly villainous liar. Gough does play a good villain, though, and the sets are truly extraordinary. The Phantom's lair is fantastic, perfectly paired with the makeup and costume on Herbert Lom.

Profile

setsuled: (Default)
setsuled

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 10:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios