setsuled: (Louise Smirk)


I didn't plan on seeing The Last Jedi again yesterday but I did. I was at the mall with my friend Tim and he wanted to see it. I didn't have a flu this time, though I was still a little congested--in any case I enjoyed it more this time though most of my opinions from my first review remain the same.

Spoilers after the screenshot



I did spot the Jedi texts in the Millennium Falcon this time, which made me feel better, but I still think it was a bad idea to make Luke sound like he couldn't be bothered to finish reading them. I can understand why Mark Hamill, and so many viewers, felt Luke was written out of character for this movie. That being said, I still mainly like the way Luke was written, aside from his short attention span when it comes to books.

He is very different but I accept the change not just because it's natural for people to change drastically after decades of new experiences. There are logical reasons why the Luke in the original trilogy would turn into the Luke of Last Jedi.



The more I look at Last Jedi, the more ways I see how it explores the same ideas as Empire Strikes Back. One of the main differences is in the amount of ego you see in Rey as compared to Empire Strikes Back era Luke--that is, Rey seems to have none. She's more focused on connecting with other people--with people in the Resistance, with the parents she longs to find, with Luke, and then even with Kylo. Luke always wants to do the right thing in the Star Wars movies but he's also more interested than Rey in being seen as a hero, as powerful. When Dak says he feels like he can take on the whole Empire by himself, Luke knows just how he feels. Luke constantly asserts his own opinion over Yoda's on Dagobah--Luke insists he can be trained, that he's not afraid; he can't lift the X-Wing because he doesn't truly believe Yoda about size not mattering, and he takes weapons into the cave even after Yoda tells him not to. And then, of course, he ends up being surprised to find his nemesis has his own face behind Darth Vader's mask.



This is why people are on the wrong track when they write about how glorious it is that Last Jedi breaks with the Lucas movies' emphasis on bloodline. When Luke finds out Darth Vader is his father, he's not exactly pleased.



Luke's horror has much to do with his vanity--how can the great hero be the son of the ultimate evil? So in Last Jedi, Luke attacks the Jedi Order on the grounds that it was vanity for them to assume any custody of the Force. Luke is like someone who was made to feel guilty about his sexual urges as a youth and so overcompensates as an adult with excessively harsh rebukes of any perceived perversion. Except Luke's enemy is pride and vanity instead of libido (who knows where that went, but that's another kettle of fish).



This is partly why Empire Strikes Back remains the stronger film--its hero has a much bigger flaw that interacts with the rest of the story in a more complex way. Which is not to say Rey's story is bad at all.



I quite like her version of the cave journey which is in some ways an echo of Luke's but in other ways its precise opposite. Luke's face in Vader's mask is a clue regarding Luke's parentage but he didn't go in there looking for his father. Rey specifically asks the mirror to show her her parents and she's disappointed when the image turns into her own reflection. But this isn't as meaningless as you might think. In a sense, Rey is her parents. She's forced to create herself in the absence of mother or father. Luke in the original trilogy might envy her position. As Satan puts it in Paradise Lost:

That we were formed then sayest thou? and the work
Of secondary hands, by task transferred
From Father to his Son? strange point and new!
Doctrine which we would know whence learned: who saw
When this creation was? rememberest thou
Thy making, while the Maker gave thee being?
We know no time when we were not as now;
Know none before us, self-begot, self-raised
By our own quickening power, when fatal course
Had circled his full orb, the birth mature
Of this our native Heaven, ethereal sons.
Our puissance is our own; our own right hand
Shall teach us highest deeds, by proof to try
Who is our equal . . .


Rey's horror is the opposite of Luke's. He's horrified by the meaning of his heritage, Rey is horrified by the absence of any emotional connexion with the parents who traded her and abandoned her.



I feel like audiences are growing increasingly intolerant of flawed heroes which is why the only new character with truly intriguing, tragic flaws is the villain, Kylo Ren. Ren isn't interested in self-creation, either, he wants to be Darth Vader 2. So he and Rey do have an understanding--both want connexion. Vader also extended his hand to Luke, proposing that they together overthrow the Emperor and rule the galaxy together. Ren's plea to Rey is much more vulnerable--he needs the emotional connexion more than Vader did. But by choosing the Dark Side he chooses powers of destruction which, like the Sith with their tradition of apprentices killing masters, is inevitably isolating. He also doesn't understand his own motivation--he talks about killing the past but the rage you see in his disappointment that Luke was never actually there to face him comes from the denial of the traditional showdown. As many observed, killing Han in the first film was almost traditional for the films which involved the killing of a mentor in the first film of each trilogy. Killing Han wasn't about killing the past but about taking Vader's place in the cycle. He tells Rey it was about severing the weakness of connexion, but Luke is right when he tells him killing his father in anger forever links him to him. And in imploring Rey to join him Ren shows he's in no way ready to go it alone.



There's also no sense that Ren is driven by any desire rule the universe based on an internalised philosophy. In Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith, Anakin makes clear he wants to rule the galaxy in the effort to bring peace, which Palpatine literally promises him. That's why he went to the temple to kill younglings, because the arrogant Jedi Order had to be obliterated if the Empire was going to work. In wanting to destroy the memory of the Jedi Order, Luke's actually not fallen far from the tree.



So both Ren and Rey aren't asking themselves how they can achieve the ultimate power, so much as wanting to know what their place is in all this, where can they fit into a scheme already in motion. In saving the Jedi Texts, Rey makes the message of Last Jedi more about preserving the past than about killing it.
setsuled: (Default)


I might've enjoyed Star Wars: The Last Jedi more if I hadn't been sick. I've had this flu for about a week and it feels like everything's sort of at a distance. Maybe that's the reason at the end of the movie I didn't get that elation I associate with the end of a Star Wars film. I just thought, "That was fine." There were some things I thought were definite flaws but I thought it was better written than Force Awakens and it was generally an agreeable way to spend over two hours in a comfortable chair.

Spoilers after the screenshot



There's a long article on Vulture about how this is the most populist Star Wars movie yet. There's plenty of support for this argument--Luke (Mark Hamill) schooling Rey (Daisy Ridley) on the arrogance of the Jedi Order, the focus on working class characters, the reveal that Rey's parents aren't royalty. On the other hand, one could point to plenty of instances where the film argues we should give up a measure of our freedom to authority figures. The whole point of the Holdo (Laura Dern) and Leia (Carrie Fisher) plot was that sometimes it's best to trust your superiors even if what they're ordering you to do seems completely ridiculous. And after all his pissing on the Jedi, Luke seems proud at the end to say that he definitely won't be the last one. If this movie were in any way meant to be a comment on the 2016 U.S. election, then Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) offering allegiance to Rey on the grounds that her lack of pedigree is immaterial to him, with Princess Leia representing the wise establishment, one can argue it's downright anti-populist, at least as far as the Donald Trump brand goes.



Though I like Kylo Ren a lot more than Donald Trump. The strongest part of the movie for me was his relationship with Rey. I wasn't one of the people who thought Rey basically being Superman in Force Awakens was a flaw, for the character or the movie, but the fact that she's more vulnerable and fallible in Last Jedi makes her a lot more interesting. The fact that she seriously begins to question the simple, straightforward hatred she has for Ren is a nice way of opening the character up for the audience, because the questions she's struggling with become the same ones the audience is asking. Can Ren be saved? Is it okay to start kind of liking him after he killed Han Solo? The fact that physical attraction is involved makes these questions unexpectedly sexy. It's like the relationship between Han and Leia in Empire taken to far more serious levels--Ren really is a scoundrel.



But things are nicely complicated by the two sides of the story, from Luke and Ren, about why Ren destroyed the Jedi temple. With all the echoing of things from earlier movies, I was surprised neither said, "So what he told you was true . . . from a certain point of view." Luke standing over Ren with his lightsabre is something that has vastly different meaning depending on whose point of view you're seeing it from.



Snoke's (Andy Serkis) biggest mistake is not having the imagination to see things from Ren's point of view. He can use the Force to read his motives but he fails to appreciate how his manipulation of Ren, connecting him with Rey to exploit Ren's inner conflict, would make Ren feel.

The fight scene in the aftermath of Snoke's death was my favourite part of the film. Suddenly all the cards have been tossed up in the air and who knows where they'll land. Rey and Ren fighting back to back is one of the nicest frenemy team-ups I've seen. I'm not even going to question why these red stormtroopers are so loyal to a dead Snoke.



I liked how Rian Johnson spent time cleaning up some of Force Awakens' flaws. One of the best is in Johnson's treatment of Hux (Domhall Gleeson). He was a joke in Force Awakens but we were meant to take him seriously--here, the movie knows he's a joke and Snoke seems much smarter for treating him that way. Last Jedi has some of its own flaws, though, mainly involving the casino planet and the new character, Rose Tico (Kelly Marie Tran), who's incredibly dull. John Boyega, in my opinion the strongest performer of all the new trilogy actors, is sadly wasted. His much more natural performance makes the budding romantic relationship between him and Rose seem totally mismatched. It's like shipping Spike Spiegal with Princess Toadstool.

That's primarily why the casino planet plot doesn't work, though the surprisingly generic 1940s look to the place didn't help. It almost felt like Star Wars Holiday Special territory. The war profiteer stuff was interesting but has been handled much better and with more complexity on Clone Wars. On the other hand, I thought Benicio De Toro was great. It was like he was reprising his role from The Usual Suspects and he completely dominated every scene he was in. I really hope he's back for the next movie.



Another standout performance was from Mark Hamill. This guy deserves a "Most Improved Over the Course of a Lifetime" award. He's come a long way from the one note whiny kid from A New Hope and Corvette Summer. But I knew he had this in him when I heard his performance in The Killing Joke, really, by far the best part of that adaptation. Killing off Luke was a really big mistake. Hamill has so much vitality and skill and there's no real narrative need to have him gone. Well, obviously there's the whole subtext about the old passing away for the new, but I really hated that scene with Yoda (Frank Oz).



Luke didn't bother to read the Jedi Texts because they were boring? Really? They're not even big books. Even if they're boring, fuck, man, it's your job. Work isn't always supposed to be easy. I might be accused of reading too much into it but knowing how much college students rely on cliff notes and Wikipedia summaries I was really not enthusiastic about a scene depicting book burning.

Luke was also at the centre of another of my least favourite parts of the film, his climactic battle with Kylo Ren. How did Ren not notice Luke was using the lightsabre Ren and Rey had just destroyed? How did it not occur to him that Luke survived the AT-AT blasts because of some kind of hologram or projection? I sincerely doubt there were many people in the audience who didn't pick up on it right away. And why would Luke give Leia phantom dice? Why would she leave them behind?



I did like the look of the salt planet though I suspect the guy deciding to taste the dirt some other guy had just walked on will end up being the butt of many a joke. I like that Johnson was trying to expand the sensory palette in giving the audience a literal taste of what they were seeing but who licks weird red dirt from someone's footprint?

But the movie had much more good than bad for me. I didn't like it as much as Rogue One but I liked it more than Force Awakens. If I were to rank the movies now, the list would probably be 1. Empire Strikes Back, 2. A New Hope, 3. Revenge of the Sith, 4. The Phantom Menace, 5. Rogue One, 6. Return of the Jedi, 7. The Last Jedi, 8. Attack of the Clones, 9. The Force Awakens.

Profile

setsuled: (Default)
setsuled

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 2nd, 2025 08:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios