<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>setsuled</title>
  <link>https://setsuled.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>setsuled - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 01:24:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>setsuled</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://setsuled.dreamwidth.org/14992.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 01:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>A Comey Day</title>
  <link>https://setsuled.dreamwidth.org/14992.html</link>
  <description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.anelnoath.com/comeyitis.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Despite he and Trump having had a &quot;thing&quot;, James Comey didn&apos;t do Trump any favours to-day. What &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; the &quot;thing&quot; Comey quotes Trump as alluding to in one of their now infamous private conversations? Comey speculated in his testimony to-day, at the insistence of John McCain, about the &quot;thing&quot;: &quot;I concluded at the time, in his memory, he was searching back to our encounter at the dinner and was preparing himself to say I offered loyalty to you, you promise loyalty to me. All of a sudden, I think his memory did not happen and he pulled up short.&quot; I guess this is different from a trial where a lawyer would stand up and say, &quot;Objection--speculative!&quot; Speculation is fair game, it seems. It&apos;s weird how often Comey was asked to speculate, anyway.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, if &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; were to speculate about &quot;the thing&quot;, I&apos;d say it was Comey&apos;s announcement about investigating Clinton&apos;s e-mails shortly before election night. At the time, that was widely seen as a show of Comey&apos;s loyalty to Trump and, wouldn&apos;t you know, Clinton&apos;s e-mails were made an important part of the committee testimony to-day by Republicans who continually, awkwardly tried to steer back to the issue. Most strikingly McCain, who was so incoherent as to seem physically unwell, insisted there was a double standard simply because Comey had concluded one investigation while another was ongoing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, now it doesn&apos;t seem likely Comey was being a Trump loyalist when he made the critical announcement about the investigation of Clinton&apos;s e-mails. But everyone at the time figured he was--certainly everyone on TV. We know Trump mainly keeps himself informed on everything through cable news, much to the consternation of his National Security Advisers. So the &quot;thing&quot;, I believe, is this narrative that Trump bought into.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe width=&quot;853&quot; height=&quot;480&quot; src=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/-CVRVN0auzM&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;allowfullscreen&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For those of us who don&apos;t want the country controlled by a dimwitted creep, Comey having previously seemed to be on Trump&apos;s side may be a blessing in disguise, and I think Republicans recognise that and that&apos;s why they&apos;re trying so hard to re-write history now. Because, with these two investigations, Comey really and truly does look impartial. You can see this is what Republicans are desperately afraid of and that&apos;s why they put out the hastily assembled, bizarrely campaign-like attack ads on Comey which seem to say little more than that Comey is politically biased. And has always been biased. Well, fortunately this &lt;i&gt;isn&apos;t&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;1984&lt;/i&gt; and you can&apos;t make people forget the narrative from six months ago with a hokey piece of propaganda. At least I hope not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Republican loyalty to Trump is really strange at this point. There&apos;s something more to it than partisanship. With all the Republicans who came out publicly against him before the election and what, one would think, is the more attractive prospect of a Pence presidency--and the political capital to be gained from pursuing criminal charges against Trump and thereby seeming bipartisan--you&apos;d think all the Republicans on the committee wouldn&apos;t be so lock-step. &lt;i&gt;Particularly&lt;/i&gt; McCain who&apos;s been insulted by Trump and who has expressed words against the orange man. It makes the incoherence of his questions this morning all the more intriguing. I feel like McCain is being blackmailed somehow, if it isn&apos;t a medical issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without a proper president right now, it occurred to me that the U.S. feels sort of headless. Then I thought, like The Headless Horseman--and Trump&apos;s the pumpkin.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=setsuled&amp;ditemid=14992&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://setsuled.dreamwidth.org/14992.html</comments>
  <category>donald trump</category>
  <category>james comey</category>
  <category>politics</category>
  <lj:music>Das Rheingold, Vierte Szene</lj:music>
  <lj:mood>groggy</lj:mood>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
